1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 1966 Renault 4
To start off, 1979 Chrysler 160 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1966 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1966 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 435 kg more than 1966 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler 160 | 1966 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | 160 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |
