1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 1972 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1979 Chrysler 160 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1972 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1972 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Let's talk about torque, 1972 Triumph 2000 (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1972 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler 160 | 1972 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | 160 | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1245 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2700 mm |
