1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 1978 Renault 5
To start off, 1979 Chrysler 160 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Renault 5 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 355 kg more than 1978 Renault 5.
Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1978 Renault 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 160 | 1978 Renault 5 | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | 160 | 5 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2410 mm |