1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 1980 Mazda 929 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1980 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1980 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 15 kg more than 1980 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler 160 | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | 160 | 929 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1070 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |
