1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 1985 Ford Mustang

To start off, 1985 Ford Mustang is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1985 Ford Mustang. (87 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Mustang weights approximately 100 kg more than 1979 Chrysler 160.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1985 Ford Mustang (161 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1985 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications:

1979 Chrysler 160 1985 Ford Mustang
Make Chrysler Ford
Model 160 Mustang
Year Released 1979 1985
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1639 cc 2294 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 89 HP 87 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 132 Nm 161 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 2800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1085 kg 1185 kg
Vehicle Length 4540 mm 4560 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2680 mm 2560 mm