1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 1986 Acura Integra
To start off, 1986 Acura Integra is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Acura Integra (113 HP) has 24 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Acura Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler 160 | 1986 Acura Integra | |
| Make | Chrysler | Acura |
| Model | 160 | Integra |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4355 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1665 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2520 mm |
