1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 1987 Mazda 323

To start off, 1987 Mazda 323 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1987 Mazda 323. (66 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 1987 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 215 kg more than 1987 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Chrysler 160 (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Mazda 323. (101 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1979 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications: