1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 1996 Eagle Vision
To start off, 1996 Eagle Vision is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Eagle Vision is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Eagle Vision (217 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Eagle Vision weights approximately 535 kg more than 1979 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Eagle Vision, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 160 | 1996 Eagle Vision | |
Make | Chrysler | Eagle |
Model | 160 | Vision |
Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |