1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Tundra (427 Nm) has 295 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler 160 | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | 160 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 4700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 3270 mm |
