1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2002 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 185 kg more than 2002 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Chrysler 160 (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1979 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 160 | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | 160 | Clio |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2480 mm |