1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2002 TVR T 350
To start off, 2002 TVR T 350 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,605 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 TVR T 350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 TVR T 350 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 261 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 TVR T 350 should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 25 kg more than 2002 TVR T 350.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 TVR T 350 (393 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 261 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2002 TVR T 350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 160 | 2002 TVR T 350 | |
Make | Chrysler | TVR |
Model | 160 | T 350 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 132 Nm | 393 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2370 mm |