1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2004 Nissan Murano

To start off, 2004 Nissan Murano is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,507 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Nissan Murano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Nissan Murano (245 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan Murano weights approximately 651 kg more than 1979 Chrysler 160. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Nissan Murano, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Nissan Murano (334 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2004 Nissan Murano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.

Compare all specifications: