1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2005 Nissan Almera
To start off, 2005 Nissan Almera is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Almera (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 160 weights approximately 8 kg more than 2005 Nissan Almera.
Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Almera, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Almera (138 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan Almera will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler 160 | 2005 Nissan Almera | |
| Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
| Model | 160 | Almera |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1597 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 138 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1077 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2540 mm |
