1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2006 Fiat Palio II
To start off, 2006 Fiat Palio II is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 1,639 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 160 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 160 (89 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (72 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 160 should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Because 1979 Chrysler 160 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 160. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Fiat Palio II, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Chrysler 160 (132 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Fiat Palio II. (103 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1979 Chrysler 160 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Fiat Palio II.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler 160 | 2006 Fiat Palio II | |
| Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
| Model | 160 | Palio II |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1639 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 132 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2380 mm |
