1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 271 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 158 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 160 | Commodore |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |