1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 160. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 160. (132 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 160 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 160 | UTE |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 132 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |