1979 Chrysler 160 vs. 2012 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC60 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 160. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 160 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 836 kg more than 1979 Chrysler 160.
Because 2012 Volvo XC60 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chrysler 160. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC60 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 160 | 2012 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | 160 | XC60 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1639 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1921 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1712 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2748 mm |