1979 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1964 Renault 4
To start off, 1979 Chrysler 1609 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Renault 4 would be higher. At 1,811 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler 1609 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Chrysler 1609 (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1964 Renault 4. (33 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Chrysler 1609 should accelerate faster than 1964 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler 1609 weights approximately 446 kg more than 1964 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Chrysler 1609 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler 1609. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler 1609 | 1964 Renault 4 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | 1609 | 4 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1811 cc | 747 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 654 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2410 mm |
