1979 Chrysler 1609 vs. 1980 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1980 Toyota Celica is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler 1609. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler 1609 would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1980 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Toyota Celica (118 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler 1609. (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler 1609. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Toyota Celica weights approximately 82 kg more than 1979 Chrysler 1609. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Toyota Celica (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Chrysler 1609. (144 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1980 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Chrysler 1609.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler 1609 | 1980 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 1609 | Celica |
Year Released | 1979 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1811 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1182 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2640 mm |