1979 Chrysler Avenger vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Avenger would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (176 HP) has 117 more horse power than 1979 Chrysler Avenger. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1979 Chrysler Avenger.
Because 1979 Chrysler Avenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler Avenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1996 Acura TL has automatic transmission and 1979 Chrysler Avenger has manual transmission. 1979 Chrysler Avenger will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Acura TL will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler Avenger | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Avenger | TL |
Year Released | 1979 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1295 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2500 mm | 2840 mm |