1979 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 104 kg more than 1979 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Oldsmobile Aurora | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Le Baron | Aurora |
Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 3473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1644 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2900 mm |