1979 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Holden Combo
To start off, 2005 Holden Combo is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 340 kg more than 2005 Holden Combo.
Because 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Holden Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2005 Holden Combo has manual transmission. 2005 Holden Combo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Holden Combo | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Le Baron | Combo |
Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 86 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4330 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2720 mm |