1979 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2005 Volvo V50
To start off, 2005 Volvo V50 is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 89 kg more than 2005 Volvo V50.
Because 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler Le Baron | 2005 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Le Baron | V50 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 218 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2650 mm |