1979 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 326 kg more than 1979 Chrysler Le Baron.
Because 2010 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2010 Mazda BT-50 has manual transmission. 2010 Mazda BT-50 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | Le Baron | BT-50 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1866 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 5080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3010 mm |
