1979 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Renault Clio
To start off, 2010 Renault Clio is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 3,678 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1979 Chrysler Le Baron is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron has automatic transmission and 2010 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2010 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Le Baron | Clio |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3678 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 60 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2480 mm |