1979 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 210 kg more than 2010 Toyota Tundra.
Because 2010 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Chrysler Le Baron. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Chrysler Le Baron | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Le Baron | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3678 cc | 5663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 5820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 3710 mm |
