1979 Citroen CX vs. 1986 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,354 cc, 1986 Mazda RX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (107 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX.
Because 1986 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Mazda RX-7 (246 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (166 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1986 Mazda RX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen CX | 1986 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 185 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 246 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 230 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2430 mm |