1979 Citroen CX vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 656 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (159 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Citroen CX | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | CX | HRT |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 159 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 300 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
