1979 Citroen CX vs. 2005 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJ is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJ (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 289 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 470 kg more than 1979 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jaguar XJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Jaguar XJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJ (525 Nm) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (161 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen CX | 2005 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | CX | XJ |
Year Released | 1979 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 390 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 525 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 86.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 84 L |