1979 Citroen CX vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,262 cc, 2006 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Citroen CX weights approximately 455 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2006 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Citroen CX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen CX | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | Tribute |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2262 cc |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 62 L |