1979 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,488 cc, 2009 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 6 (169 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Citroen CX weights approximately 140 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda 6 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen CX | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 6 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2488 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 64 L |