1979 Citroen CX vs. 2009 Saab 05-Sep
To start off, 2009 Saab 05-Sep is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,290 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Saab 05-Sep is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (256 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1979 Citroen CX. (101 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saab 05-Sep should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Saab 05-Sep weights approximately 313 kg more than 1979 Citroen CX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Saab 05-Sep (258 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen CX. (161 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Saab 05-Sep will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen CX | 2009 Saab 05-Sep | |
Make | Citroen | Saab |
Model | CX | 05-Sep |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 161 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1800 mm |