1979 Citroen CX vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Citroen CX (107 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2010 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Citroen CX should accelerate faster than 2010 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Citroen CX weights approximately 800 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen CX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Citroen CX (166 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 118 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Citroen CX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen CX | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | Citroen | Tata |
Model | CX | Nano |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.9 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 165 km/hour | 105 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4970 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2230 mm |