1979 Citroen GSA vs. 1963 Holden EJ

To start off, 1979 Citroen GSA is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1979 Citroen GSA. (63 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 194 kg more than 1979 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1963 Holden EJ is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Holden EJ. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen GSA. (98 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen GSA.

Compare all specifications: