1979 Citroen GSA vs. 1968 Mazda 1000
To start off, 1979 Citroen GSA is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda 1000 would be higher. At 1,168 cc (4 cylinders), 1968 Mazda 1000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda 1000 (57 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1979 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda 1000 should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Citroen GSA weights approximately 190 kg more than 1968 Mazda 1000.
Because 1968 Mazda 1000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda 1000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen GSA | 1968 Mazda 1000 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | 1000 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1168 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 55 L |