1979 Citroen GSA vs. 1968 Mazda R-100
To start off, 1979 Citroen GSA is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mazda R-100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mazda R-100 would be higher. At 1,963 cc, 1968 Mazda R-100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Mazda R-100 (110 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1979 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Mazda R-100 should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Citroen GSA weights approximately 120 kg more than 1968 Mazda R-100.
Because 1968 Mazda R-100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Mazda R-100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen GSA | 1968 Mazda R-100 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | R-100 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1963 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2270 mm |