1979 Citroen GSA vs. 1986 Ford Tempo
To start off, 1986 Ford Tempo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Ford Tempo (89 HP @ 4700 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1979 Citroen GSA. (64 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Ford Tempo should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Ford Tempo weights approximately 185 kg more than 1979 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Ford Tempo (170 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Citroen GSA. (94 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Citroen GSA.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen GSA | 1986 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | GSA | Tempo |
Year Released | 1979 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1299 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Torque | 94 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4200 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2540 mm |