1979 Citroen GSA vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (270 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1979 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 255 kg more than 1979 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Mazda CX-9 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 Citroen GSA. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen GSA | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 3726 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 76 L |