1979 Citroen GSA vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,129 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Citroen GSA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (83 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1979 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen GSA.
Because 2009 Smart ForTwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Smart ForTwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Citroen GSA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen GSA | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | GSA | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1979 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 33 L |