1979 Citroen GSA vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1979 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 1041 kg more than 1979 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen GSA | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1727 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2875 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 76 L |