1979 Citroen GSA vs. 2012 Mazda 6
To start off, 2012 Mazda 6 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Citroen GSA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Citroen GSA would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 6 (153 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1979 Citroen GSA. (56 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1979 Citroen GSA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 6 weights approximately 510 kg more than 1979 Citroen GSA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Citroen GSA | 2012 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | GSA | 6 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1129 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 56 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 925 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4190 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 70 L |