1979 Daihatsu Charade vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 1979 Daihatsu Charade is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 1,147 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Triumph Herald is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Daihatsu Charade (51 HP) has 1 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (50 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Daihatsu Charade should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph Herald weights approximately 156 kg more than 1979 Daihatsu Charade.
Because 1963 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Daihatsu Charade, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Daihatsu Charade | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Daihatsu | Triumph |
Model | Charade | Herald |
Year Released | 1979 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 51 HP | 50 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 69.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 76 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 841 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2330 mm |