1979 Daihatsu Charade vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Daihatsu Charade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Daihatsu Charade would be higher. At 1,786 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 595 kg more than 1979 Daihatsu Charade.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Daihatsu Charade | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Daihatsu | Toyota |
Model | Charade | Matrix |
Year Released | 1979 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 1786 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 126 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 21.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 760 kg | 1355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3560 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 50 L |