1979 Daihatsu Taft vs. 2000 Lotus M250
To start off, 2000 Lotus M250 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Daihatsu Taft. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Daihatsu Taft would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Lotus M250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lotus M250 (176 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1979 Daihatsu Taft. (44 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lotus M250 should accelerate faster than 1979 Daihatsu Taft. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Daihatsu Taft weights approximately 345 kg more than 2000 Lotus M250.
Because 1979 Daihatsu Taft is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Lotus M250. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Daihatsu Taft will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lotus M250 (180 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Daihatsu Taft. (63 Nm). This means 2000 Lotus M250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Daihatsu Taft.
Compare all specifications:
| 1979 Daihatsu Taft | 2000 Lotus M250 | |
| Make | Daihatsu | Lotus |
| Model | Taft | M250 |
| Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
| Engine Size | 958 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 44 HP | 176 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7800 RPM |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 675 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3370 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2520 mm |
