1979 Datsun 280 vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1979 Datsun 280 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,751 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Datsun 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Datsun 280 (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Datsun 280 should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Datsun 280 weights approximately 102 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1979 Datsun 280 (202 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1979 Datsun 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Datsun 280 | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Datsun | Triumph |
Model | 280 | 2000 |
Year Released | 1979 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2751 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 202 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1272 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2700 mm |