1979 Datsun 280 vs. 1982 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1982 Ford Falcon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 3,271 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 Datsun 280 (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1982 Ford Falcon. (109 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 Datsun 280 should accelerate faster than 1982 Ford Falcon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Falcon weights approximately 98 kg more than 1979 Datsun 280.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Falcon (228 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Datsun 280. (202 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1982 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Datsun 280.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Datsun 280 | 1982 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Datsun | Ford |
Model | 280 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1979 | 1982 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2751 cc | 3271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 202 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1272 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2830 mm |