1979 Datsun 280 vs. 2008 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Datsun 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Datsun 280 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1979 Datsun 280. (140 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1979 Datsun 280.
Because 1979 Datsun 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Datsun 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Datsun 280. (202 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Datsun 280. 2008 Mazda CX-9 has automatic transmission and 1979 Datsun 280 has manual transmission. 1979 Datsun 280 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Mazda CX-9 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Datsun 280 | 2008 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Datsun | Mazda |
Model | 280 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2753 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 202 Nm | 366 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2880 mm |