1979 Datsun Laurel vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Datsun Laurel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Datsun Laurel would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Datsun Laurel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1979 Datsun Laurel. (113 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1979 Datsun Laurel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 467 kg more than 1979 Datsun Laurel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1979 Datsun Laurel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Datsun Laurel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 175 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1979 Datsun Laurel | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | Datsun | Ford |
Model | Laurel | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1979 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2393 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.7 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.6:1 | 12.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1188 kg | 1655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4409 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2085 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1623 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 51 L |