1979 De Tomaso Deauville vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 De Tomaso Deauville. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 De Tomaso Deauville would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 De Tomaso Deauville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 De Tomaso Deauville (296 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 De Tomaso Deauville should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 De Tomaso Deauville weights approximately 732 kg more than 2000 Ford TS-50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 De Tomaso Deauville (450 Nm) has 275 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 1979 De Tomaso Deauville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
1979 De Tomaso Deauville | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | De Tomaso | Ford |
Model | Deauville | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1979 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 450 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1940 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |