1979 De Tomaso Longchamp vs. 1966 DKW Munga
To start off, 1979 De Tomaso Longchamp is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,763 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 De Tomaso Longchamp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1979 De Tomaso Longchamp (297 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1966 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1979 De Tomaso Longchamp should accelerate faster than 1966 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 De Tomaso Longchamp weights approximately 590 kg more than 1966 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1979 De Tomaso Longchamp. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1979 De Tomaso Longchamp | 1966 DKW Munga | |
Make | De Tomaso | DKW |
Model | Longchamp | Munga |
Year Released | 1979 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5763 cc | 978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 297 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1700 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2010 mm |